Pipeline Politics Taint U.S. War

Pipeline politics taint U.S. state of war 2002-03-18, Chicago Tribune http:// conditions.chicagotribune.com/2002-03-18/ tidings/0203180046_1_caspian-talib... Outside this country, there is a widespread belief that U.S. forces deployments in Central Asia mostly are about anoint. An article in the Guardian of London headlined, A pro-western regime in capital of Afghanistan should give the U.S. an Afghan route for Caspian anoint, foreshadowed the kind of sceptical insurance coverage the U.S. war now receives in many countries. pen George Monbiot ... wrote that the U.S. oil company Unocal Corp. had been negotiating with the Taliban since 1995 to build oil and gas origins from Turkmenistan, through Afghanistan and into Pakistani ports on the Arabian sea. Unocal pulled out of the deal subsequently the 1998 terrorist attacks on U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were linked to terrorists based in Afghanistan. The terrorist acts of Sept. 11, though tragic, provided the c rotch hair judicature a [ semblance] to invade Afghanistan, oust the petulant Taliban and, coincidentally, polish the way for the pipeline. To make things even smoother, the U.S.

engineered the rise to forefinger of twain former Unocal employees: Hamid Karzai, the new interim president of Afghanistan, and Zalmay Khalizad, the Bush administrations Afghanistan envoy. [Uri] Averny, a former member of the Israeli Knesset ... argues that the war on terrorism provides a perfect pretext for the Statess imperial interests. If one looks at the part of the vauntingly American bases created for the war, one is struck by t he feature that they are completely identic! al to the route of the projected oil pipeline to the Indian Ocean. No wonder the rest of the gentleman is a bit skeptical about our war on evildoers.If you essential to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay